Loading chat...

MD SB475

Bill

Status

Enrolled

4/9/2026

Primary Sponsor

Charles Sydnor

Click for details

Origin

Senate

2026 Regular Session

AI Summary

  • Creative expression (music, dance, visual art, poetry, literature, film, performance art) of a defendant is not admissible as evidence against them in criminal or juvenile proceedings unless the court makes specific findings by a preponderance of evidence

  • Courts must find that the defendant intended the expression to be literal rather than figurative or fictional, that it refers to specific facts of the alleged offense, and that it is relevant to a disputed factual issue

  • For derivative creative works, prosecutors must show the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the expression as their own

  • Exception allows creative expression to be admitted in juvenile cases for purposes of evaluating or recommending mental health services or diversion programs

  • Takes effect October 1, 2026

Legislative Description

Criminal Procedure - Evidence - Protecting Artists' Creative Expression (PACE Act)

Evidence

Last Action

Passed Enrolled

4/9/2026

Committee Referrals

Judiciary3/24/2026
Judicial Proceedings2/2/2026

Full Bill Text

No bill text available