Loading chat...
MD SB475
Bill
Status
4/9/2026
Primary Sponsor
Charles Sydnor
Click for details
AI Summary
-
Creative expression (music, dance, visual art, poetry, literature, film, performance art) of a defendant is not admissible as evidence against them in criminal or juvenile proceedings unless the court makes specific findings by a preponderance of evidence
-
Courts must find that the defendant intended the expression to be literal rather than figurative or fictional, that it refers to specific facts of the alleged offense, and that it is relevant to a disputed factual issue
-
For derivative creative works, prosecutors must show the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the expression as their own
-
Exception allows creative expression to be admitted in juvenile cases for purposes of evaluating or recommending mental health services or diversion programs
-
Takes effect October 1, 2026
Legislative Description
Criminal Procedure - Evidence - Protecting Artists' Creative Expression (PACE Act)
Evidence
Last Action
Passed Enrolled
4/9/2026