Loading chat...

MI HB5778

Bill

Status

Introduced

7/13/2016

Primary Sponsor

Martin Howrylak

Click for details

Origin

House of Representatives

98th Legislature

AI Summary

  • Attorney general, prosecuting attorney, or any person may commence a civil action if a public body did not comply or is not complying with the Open Meetings Act.

  • Civil actions may seek declaratory judgment that a public body violated the act, or mandamus/injunctive relief to compel compliance or enjoin further noncompliance.

  • Actions against local public bodies must be filed in circuit court with proper venue in any county where the public body serves; actions against state public bodies must be filed in the Court of Claims.

  • Actions for mandamus must be commenced in the Court of Appeals, and no security is required as a condition for obtaining preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order.

  • Person who obtains a judicial finding of noncompliance shall recover court costs and actual attorney fees; actions must be commenced within 1 year of the violation.

Legislative Description

Civil rights; open meetings; remedies for violations of the open meetings act; revise. Amends sec. 11 of 1976 PA 267 (MCL 15.271).

Civil rights: open meetings

Last Action

Bill Electronically Reproduced 07/13/2016

8/3/2016

Committee Referrals

Judiciary7/13/2016

Full Bill Text

No bill text available