NC S642

Establishes a rebuttable presumption that the actual or proposed use of property is valid or consistent with local zoning ordinances in quasi-judicial proceedings before boards of adjustment.

Requires clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption of validity, with the burden placed on the city or official who made the original decision.

Changes the standard of review for appeals in the nature of certiorari from "record-based review" to "de novo" hearings before the board of adjustment.

Applies to all quasi-judicial decisions made by boards of adjustment, including appeals of zoning decisions and enforcement actions.

Becomes effective upon enactment and applies to all board of adjustment actions taken on or after the effective date.