NV AB64

Expands the attorney-client privilege exception to the Open Meeting Law, allowing public bodies to meet privately to receive legal advice on any matter within their jurisdiction (not just litigation) and deliberate on that advice

Requires a physical meeting location open to the public when a public body uses remote technology to adjudicate contested cases requiring notice under NRS 233B.121 or to hold workshops/hearings on regulations

Limits the requirement to verbally read public comment call-in instructions to remote meetings that lack a designated physical location for public attendance

Changes witness testimony privilege from a qualified privilege to protection only when the witness testifies under oath subject to perjury penalties, while clarifying that defamation claims against public commenters remain unaffected by the Open Meeting Law

Clarifies that Open Meeting Law notice and public access requirements do not apply to regulatory body investigations of licensees prior to a decision to proceed with disciplinary action, unless the licensee requests public proceedings