NY S08390

AI-created evidence in criminal proceedings requires independent corroborating evidence and qualified expert testimony proving the AI system's reliability and accuracy through rigorous scientific testing.

AI-processed evidence in criminal proceedings requires qualified expert testimony establishing the reliability and accuracy of the specific AI use, without the need for independent corroboration.

Identical admissibility standards apply to civil proceedings, with the same requirements for independent evidence support and expert validation of AI reliability.

"Created" evidence means AI producing new information not present in or reasonably deducible from existing information; "processed" evidence means AI drawing conclusions from existing information not reasonably deducible without AI.

Courts may protect trade secrets, privileged government information, and law enforcement techniques from disclosure during expert testimony if such disclosure would compromise system effectiveness.