Loading chat...
NY A04992
Bill
Status
2/10/2025
Primary Sponsor
Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn
Click for details
AI Summary
-
Establishes that employment discrimination can be proven through a practice's discriminatory effect (disparate impact), even without discriminatory intent
-
Defines discriminatory effect as a practice that actually or predictably results in disparate impact based on race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship/immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, age, disability, marital status, domestic violence victim status, lawful income source, or familial status
-
Allows employers to defend challenged practices by demonstrating a "legally sufficient justification" - showing the practice is necessary to achieve substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests and no less discriminatory alternative exists
-
Sets burden-shifting framework: complainant must first prove discriminatory effect, then respondent must prove legitimate justification, then complainant may prove less discriminatory alternatives exist
-
Specifies that proving a legally sufficient justification cannot be used as a defense against intentional discrimination claims
Legislative Description
Clarifies the standard for intentional discrimination or retaliation claims by requiring a person or persons prove that an unlawful motivation was a motivating factor and not "the sole motivating factor" or a "but-for cause" of the challenged treatment.
Last Action
referred to governmental operations
1/7/2026