Loading chat...
WA HB2643
Bill
Status
1/23/2026
Primary Sponsor
Tarra Simmons
Click for details
AI Summary
-
Peace officers gain a due process right to petition superior court, appeal, or intervene in any prosecuting agency decision to place them on a Brady/Giglio list (lists of witnesses with known credibility or impeachment issues)
-
Superior courts may conduct in-camera evidence review and closed hearings, with authority to affirm, modify, or reverse the prosecuting agency's decision and order removal from the list
-
All evidence presented to the court remains under seal and confidential unless otherwise ordered
-
The standard of proof for allegations under these proceedings is preponderance of the evidence unless a higher standard is required by law
-
Prosecutors retain their existing constitutional obligations under Brady v. Maryland (1963) and Giglio v. United States (1972) to disclose impeachment and exculpatory evidence to defense counsel
Legislative Description
Concerning the due process requirements and the procedures of a peace officer being placed on Brady and Giglio lists.
Last Action
First reading, referred to Community Safety.
1/23/2026